With one hundred languages
and utterphrases
genet writes
nearly nonexistant branches
that interlink generoots
sprouting sensibility,
whereas deleuzeguattari's notion
into the barometer of a longitude
kept alive
by
for a rhizomatic antigenealogy
within w/hole relays
as if
becomingsintocirculatingintensities
but
some deep genealogy,
a strength
not found in its nearly nonexistant branches
but instead
by sprouting rebel
into whole languages of sensibility
rising from a rhizomatic newness
by words
and phrases
whereas deleuzeguattari's
is a
that inter
into w/hole relations
of circulating
and
their deterritorializing
into a
as
that we all ways
forthelongitudeofafeeling
of utternewness
as the barometer
of
something genet calls
presentiment
genet writes of sprouting sensibility
kept alive by utter newness nearly not found
to reveal in its strength some deep genealogy
not found in its nearly nonexistant branches
but instead in its roots and sprouting rebels
whole languages of sensibility by words and phrases
whereas deleuzeguattari's rhizomatic links
weave becomings into w/hole relays of circulating tensities
and figure their deterritorializing stretch as hunger
for the longitude of a feeling of utter newness
as the barometer of something genet calls presentiment
in
its
roots
and
phrases
becomings
stretch
a
barometer
of
presentiment
To insure children are liberated, they have to learn to disobey."
(Loris Malaguzzi)
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home